VDARE: We Still Have Karl Rove to Kick Around Some More
Here’s an excerpt in which I uncharacteristically show some sympathy for Karl Rove and George Bush from my new VDARE.com column:
It’s important to fully understand why the lessons the two Texans, Rove and Bush, learned in their home state didn’t apply in other heavily Hispanic states.
So far, the mortgage meltdown hasn’t been as bad in Texas as in the four “Sand States” (as they were known on Wall Street during the Bubble): California , Nevada , Arizona , and Florida . These are home to half of the foreclosures and a large majority of the defaulted mortgage money.
Partly this is due to the Oil Bubble, which now appears to be ending. Oil prices over $100 per barrel kept the Texas economy strong in 2008, allowing debtors to avoid foreclosure.
Also, the enormous amount of land and the lack of environmental restrictions on home development in Texas means that when the federal government stimulates demand, the supply of housing increases quickly as well, keeping housing prices reasonable.
Countries with y
Finally, what Rove and Bush missed was how different was Texas’s economic and immigration history over the last three decades relative to the seemingly similar Sand States. Due to OPEC’s oil price increases in the 1970s, Texas experienced a huge construction boom thirty years ago. That mostly attracted construction workers from the rest of the U.S. rather than from Mexico , because Mexico was simultaneously experiencing its own oil boom following massive new discoveries.
When oil prices collapsed in 1982, the economies of Texas and Mexico slumped simultaneously. The big wave of post-1982 unemployed illegal aliens therefore headed for California rather than for Texas .
That’s why San Antonio had “surprisingly low levels” of immigration from 1965 to 2000, according to the important new book quantitatively comparing Mexican-Americans in San Antonio and Los Angeles in 1965 and 2000, Generations of Exclusion, by sociologists associated with the UCLA Chicano Studies Program.
The 2000 Census found that California ’s foreign-born population (26 percent of all residents) was almost twice as large as Texas ’s (14 percent).
As Texans, Rove and Bush apparently just couldn’t understand the quantity and quality of the immigration situation in the other heavily Hispanic states. In 2000, Texas had a large but fairly well-rooted, stable, and assimilated Mexican-American population that had a reasonable potential to make enough money in resource-extraction or other blue-collar jobs to afford to buy Texas ’s cheap houses.
In sharp contrast, California had a huge and mostly new, ill-educated, and unassimilated Mexican-American population that didn’t have even a chance of making enough money in Silicon Valley or Hollywood to afford California ’s already expensive houses.
And Nevada, Arizona, and Florida were more like California than they were like Texas. [More]
So, who are the bad guys here: Texans or Californians?
Related posts: Family affair, Bill jakob, Maryland election results, Mae young, Mail order bride movie